I’ve compiled here, one of the best blogger templates / themes. These cool designs can give your Blogspot Blog a great uplift. I hope you enjoy
1- Visionary Reloaded, Magazine Style Blogger Theme:

Demo | Download
2- Template Tabs, Magazine Style Blogger Theme:

Demo | Download
3- Revolution, Magazine Style Blogger Theme:

Demo | Download
4- Langit, Magazine Style [...]

Consumer magazine Which? Computer says it has received complaints from a number of people who claim they have been falsely targeted by a law firm going after illegal file sharers.

Which? states that some of those who have received letters from ACS:Law have no knowledge of the offences they’re alleged to have committed. 10 new people have approached the magazine since the law company sent out its most recent round of letters a fortnight ago.

According to the magazine’s technology editor, Matt Bath: “Innocent consumers are being threatened with legal action for copyright infringements they not only haven’t committed, but wouldn’t know how to commit.”

Out-of-court settlements

ACS:Law offers those it contacts the opportunity to settle out of court for around £500, and Bath fears that many will choose that route to avoid the stress and expense of a court battle.

On its website, ACS:Law claims that “80 per cent of all defendants opt for settlements outside of court, for amounts more than originally claimed,” and says that it has been instructed “to increase the number of claims we issue at court by at least 300 per cent over the coming months.”

However, it admitted it had dropped some cases from last year. To date none of its actions has resulted in a court appearance, and the company is under investigation by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

According to ACS:Law spokesman Anthony Crossley, the firm represents a number of clients, including DigiProtect, a German content forum based in Frankfurt. The front page of the DigiProtect website says “We love music”.

Bath advises those who are innocent but accused to “rigorously deny it and, if possible, provide physical evidence of where they were when the infringement took place,” and to contact Which?.

TAIPEI: A Taiwanese firm allegedly sold equipment that can be used to make nuclear weapons to Iran under a request from China, a Taipei-based magazine said.

The firm received an online order from China last year to buy pressure transducers on behalf of an Iranian oil company for pipeline construction, the magazine reported this week.

The firm later shipped 108 pressure transducers it had acquired from a Swiss firm to Iran as exporting the items was not illegal in Switzerland or Taiwan, the report said, citing a Taiwanese trade official.

China, despite claiming its unwillingness to provide Iran with sensitive technology, has “secretly shipped critical components” to the country through Taiwanese firms, the report quoted an unnamed source as saying. The magazine did not identify any of the companies allegedly involved.

WASHINGTON – Sami Ibrahim: A US magazine has revealed that US president Barack Obama has opposed drone strikes in Quetta, the provincial capital of Balochistan province, fearing that this will bring huge mass causalities, Geo news corresponded Sami Ibrahim reported from Washington on Monday morning.

According to sources, the magazine quoted, amid the advisory committee meeting of Obama administration, during the discussion over the extension of drone strikes from the tribal areas of Pakistan to Balochistan’s Quetta city, following the reports regarding alleged presence of the whereabouts of Taliban leader Mulla Omar in there and adjoining areas, president Obama favored the opinion that this decision will be folly, unwise and will jeopardize civilian lives.

Obama, on the occasion, feared the drone attacks on Quetta would merely result in massive mass destruction of civilian lives.

Sources told magazine, the meeting mulled over the surge in drone strike on Pakistan but no final decision could be reached and the meeting agreed further discussion over the issue.